Walter F. Foskett Professor of Law; Director of the Center for Constitutional Democracy
Access Professor Williams' author profiles on the following services:
Federalism and Gender Equality, 46 FEDERAL LAW REVIEW 491 (2018). [HeinOnline]
Women and Judging: A Feminist Approach to Judging and the Issue of Customary Law (Eleventh Annual Ruth Bader Ginsburg Lecture) 36 THOMAS JEFFERSON LAW REVIEW 25 (2013). [ HeinOnline]
Democracy, Freedom of Speech and Feminist Theory: A Response to Post and Weinstein 97 VIRGINIA LAW REVIEW 603 (2011). [HeinOnline]
Democracy, Gender Equality, and Customary Law: Constitutionalizing Internal Cultural Disruption 18 INDIANA JOURNAL OF GLOBAL LEGAL STUDIES 65 (2011). [HeinOnline]
Free Speech and Autonomy: Thinkers, Storytellers, and a Systemic Approach to Speech 27 CONSTITUTIONAL COMMENTARY 399 (2011). [HeinOnline]
Feminist Theory and Freedom of Speech, 84 INDIANA LAW JOURNAL 999 (2009). [HeinOnline]
Autonomy and the Public/Private Distinction in Bioethics and Law, 12 INDIANA JOURNAL OF GLOBAL LEGAL STUDIES 483 (2005). [HeinOnline]
Religion, Politics, and Feminist Epistemology: A Comment on the Uses and Abuses of Morality in Public Discourse, 77 INDIANA LAW JOURNAL 267 (2002). [HeinOnline]
Truth, Speech, and Ethics, 30 GENDERS (November 1999).
Sense and Sensibility: Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s Mentoring Style as a Blend of Rigor and Compassion (with David C. Williams), 20 UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII LAW REVIEW 589 (1998). [HeinOnline]
A Feminist Reassessment of Civil Society, 72 INDIANA LAW JOURNAL 417 (1997). [HeinOnline] Reprinted in FAMILY, STATE, AND LAW (Michael D.A. Freeman, Eds.), Brookfield, VT: Ashgate/Dartmouth, 1999.
A Feminist Theory of Malebashing (with David C. Williams), 4 MICHIGAN JOURNAL OF GENDER AND LAW 35 (1997). [HeinOnline]
Globalization, Privatization, and a Feminist “Public”: A Response to Professor Eisenstein, 4 INDIANA JOURNAL OF GLOBAL LEGAL STUDIES 97 (1996). [HeinOnline]
The Adverse Testimony Privilege, Inalienable Entitlements, and the “Internal Stance”: A Response to Professor Regan, 81 VIRGINIA LAW REVIEW 2167 (1995). [HeinOnline]
Bioethics and Epistemology: A Response to Professor Arras, 69 INDIANA LAW JOURNAL 1021 (1994). [HeinOnline]
Feminist Jurisprudence and Free Speech Theory, 68 TULANE LAW REVIEW 1563 (1994). [HeinOnline]
Feminist Legal Epistemology, 8 BERKELEY WOMEN’S LAW JOURNAL 63 (1993). [HeinOnline]
Legal Education, Feminist Epistemology, and the Socratic Method, 45 STANFORD LAW REVIEW 1571 (1993). [HeinOnline]
Content Discrimination and the First Amendment, 139 UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA LAW REVIEW 615 (1991). [HeinOnline]
Volitionalism and Religious Liberty (with David C. Williams), 76 CORNELL LAW REVIEW 769 (1991). [HeinOnline]
Feminism’s Search for the Feminine: Essentialism, Utopianism, and Community, 75 CORNELL LAW REVIEW 700 (1990). [HeinOnline]
The Uses of Myth: A Response to Professor Bassett, 4 JOURNAL OF LAW AND RELIGION 153 (1986). [HeinOnline]
Comment. Restrictions on Public Broadcasters’ Rights to Editorialize: FCC v. League of Women Voters, 98 HARVARD LAW REVIEW 205 (1984). [HeinOnline]
Note. Reinterpreting the Religion Clauses: Constitutional Construction and Conceptions of the Self, 97 HARVARD LAW REVIEW 1468 (1984). [HeinOnline]