Skip to Main Content

Austen L. Parrish

Faculty bibliography for Dean Parrish

Articles

Austen L. Parrish

Dean and James H. Rudy Professor of Law


Foreign Nations, Constitutional Rights, and International Law88 FORDHAM LAW REVIEW ONLINE 88 (2019). [HeinOnline]

Personal Jurisdiction: The Transnational Difference59 VIRGINIA JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW 97 (2019). [HeinOnline] [SSRN]

Fading Extraterritoriality and Isolationism?: Developments in the United States, 24 INDIANA JOURNAL OF GLOBAL LEGAL STUDIES 207 (2017). [HeinOnline] [SSRN]

Kiobel’s Broader Significance: Implications for International Legal TheoryAMERICAN JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW UNBOUND e-19 (2014). [HeinOnline]

Introductory Remarks -- Arctic Law: The Challenges of Governance in the Changing Arctic107 AMERICAN SOCIETY OF INTERNATIONAL LAW PROCEEDINGS 271 (2013). [HeinOnline]

Kiobel, Unilateralism, and the Retreat from Extraterritoriality, 28 MARYLAND JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW 208 (2013). [HeinOnline] [SSRN]

State Court International Human Rights Litigation: A Concerning Trend?3 U.C. IRVINE LAW REVIEW 25 (2013). [SSRN] [HeinOnline]

Domestic Responses to Transnational Crime: The Limits of National Law, 23 CRIMINAL LAW FORUM 275 (2012). [HeinOnline] [SSRN] [PDF]

Evading Legislative Jurisdiction87 NOTRE DAME LAW REVIEW 1673 (2012). [SSRN] [HeinOnline]

Morrison, The Effects Test, and the Presumption Against Extraterritoriality: A Reply to Professor Dodge105 AMERICAN SOCIETY OF INTERNATIONAL LAW PROCEEDINGS 399 (2011). [HeinOnline] [SSRN]

Symposium Introduction – Beyond Borders: Extraterritoriality in American Law, 39 SOUTHWESTERN LAW REVIEW 571 (2011). [HeinOnline]

Rehabilitating Territoriality in Human Rights, 32 CARDOZO LAW REVIEW 1099 (2011). [SSRN] [HeinOnline]

Duplicative Foreign Litigation, 78 GEORGE WASHINGTON LAW REVIEW 237 (2010). [SSRN] [HeinOnline]

Comity and Foreign Parallel Proceedings: A Reply to Black and Swan. Lloyd’s Underwriters v. Cominco LTD.45 CANADIAN BUSINESS LAW JOURNAL 209 (2009). [SSRN] [HeinOnline]

Reclaiming International Law from Extraterritoriality, 93 MINNESOTA LAW REVIEW 815 (2009). [SSRN] [HeinOnline]

The Effects Test: Extraterritoriality’s Fifth Business61 VANDERBILT LAW REVIEW 1455 (2008). [SSRN] [HeinOnline]

Challenging the Assumption of Equality: The Due Process Rights of Foreign Litigants in U.S. Courts (panelist), 5 SANTA CLARA JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW 2-410 (2007). [HeinOnline]

Changing Territoriality, Fading Sovereignty, and the Development of Indigenous Group Rights, 31 AMERICAN INDIAN LAW REVIEW 291 (2007). [SSRN] [HeinOnline]

Litigating Canada-U.S. Transboundary Harm: International Environmental Lawmaking and the Threat of Extraterritorial Reciprocity (with Shi Ling Hsu), 48 VIRGINIA JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW 1 (2007). [HeinOnline] [SSRN]

Storm in a Teacup: The U.S. Supreme Court’s Use of Foreign Law, 2007 ILLINOIS LAW REVIEW 637 (2007). [SSRN] [HeinOnline]

Mixed Blessings: The Great Lakes Compact and Agreement, the IJC, and International Dispute Resolution2006 MICHIGAN STATE LAW REVIEW 1299 (2006). [SSRN] [HeinOnline]

Sovereignty, Not Due Process: Personal Jurisdiction Over Nonresident, Alien Defendants, 41 WAKE FOREST LAW REVIEW 1 (2006). [SSRN] [HeinOnline] Reprinted in CYBER JURISDICTION: A LEGAL VISION (C. Vidya Ed.). Hyderabad: Icfai University Press, 2006.

Trail Smelter Déjà Vu: Extraterritoriality, International Environmental Law and the Search for Solutions to Canadian-U.S. Transboundary Water Pollution Disputes, 85 BOSTON UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW 363 (2005). [HeinOnline] [SSRN]

Avoiding the Mistakes of Terrell R.: The Undoing of the California Tort Claims Act and the Move to Absolute Governmental Immunity in Foster Care Placement and Supervision, 15 STANFORD LAW & POLICY REVIEW 267 (2004). [HeinOnline] [SSRN]